Riportiamo qui di seguito una parte del contributo di Lorenzo Calvi da cui, primo a nostro giudizio, è nato il dibattito sulla esistenza o meno di una psicoterapia fenomenologica. Rimandiamo quindi a prossime nostre pubblicazioni oltre that the magazine Comprendre , we are ideal and spiritual twin, found among the links.
" ... But empathy is another thing. Of this, especially in the clinical setting, we can hope that both warm, because I want to see what the patient would want to have a doctor or a psychologist or nurse a cold and imparticipable. why can not the adjective and noun believe that empathy is heat. The author is to be quoted about empathy, of course, Edith Stein and also Rossi Monti and AC dancers do. But remember that his thoughts on empathy a historical references without stating the author 's refer to my work. can be summarized by saying that empathy is notice the other. And this does not mean in itself love him. It may well also mean hate, and how! Empathy is feeling the presence of the other, it stand out from the background as a figure, draw him dall'insignificanza, indeed, place him and dall'inesistenza opening a niche in our indifference. Empathy is a mimetic practice, "a mimesis of the other imperceptible" (1969). Practice because it is where the intentionality of consciousness declines in ways that can only be expressed with the use of bodily metaphors and movement: "reach out", "open", "welcome". Mimetic because the movements are intentional model on the other. When the mimetic practice that is more subliminal consciousness and emerge as a thrill, then we have empathy with, so named because one gets the impression that the other has somehow crept into us. At this point we can expect some segnale, che, reciprocamente, la stessa cosa si stia verificando nell’altro (1998). In questo scambio mimetico si gioca la partita del transfert e del controtransfert, ben lungi dal perdersi nella confusione d’una relazione omogeneizzata dal “fuoco” dell’empatia, come sospettano i nostri AA. Essi suggeriscono di ricordare “l’odio nel controtransfert” (Winnicott) ed io credo di averlo fatto implicitamente dicendo che l’incontro empatico è un “corpo a corpo” (1993; 1999 b), che il fenomenologo oscilla tra “la fusione e la separazione” (1993, 1999 b). Ho portato the example of a fight alongside that of love (1990). I even launched the challenge to express empathic encounter with a more trivial and the communal, of a physical too heavy, so "is c." or "no c." a person when you notice or do not notice it (1998). Who is talking about in a contemplative, aesthetic dell'antropofenomenologia (De Martis and Petrella), of "aesthetic results" (Stanghellini) should review its critical from these positions. While all bent in the direction of psychology psychotherapy (primarily, psychoanalysis) pay attention almost exclusively to the psyche, phenomenology has greatly enhanced attention to the body and bodily expressiveness. This is what we would say that is not Rossi Monti, which introduces his paper with a five-point summary of the phenomenology, where the first point states that is considered 'body election in contact with the patient, 'ear to the eye place (Stanghellini and Ballerini), turning his attention mainly to the experiences internal and experiences, to experience symptoms rather that the symptoms of the expression "(italics in the text ). I would say instead that the eye does not recede in front of the ear as if listening was something more and different instrument unavoidable verbal communication. You can put emphasis on listening as long as you want, but you can not challenge his eye after clear priorities, of course, is concerned that the natural eye as an organ of sight but as transcendental organ of vision: the whole phenomenology, psychiatric you want philosophy, is a succession of metaphors visual and physical. The "symptoms experience" could not be learned if not translate into "symptoms of", and this translation is to take the body, the embodiment of expressiveness across the board, which includes "what I can not say in words " (Callieri). Moreover the same Monti Rossi and AC Ballerini define phenomenology ' a way to see new and different things "(my emphasis). "
L. Calvi, Comprendre / 10.
0 comments:
Post a Comment